![]() Attempts to cultivate support in the form of pride from the host population help to make possible the armed forces use of state sanctioned 1 violence. I do so against the backdrop of the reverence with which the institution is held amongst the wider public through an experiential foregrounding of the pride that circulates amongst, between and within military actors and the wider public. ![]() The wider, normative aim of the article is animated by my own modest attempt to demilitarize through revealing the work pride does in canonizing an institution revered by the public.ĭrawn from my auto-ethnographic experiences of the Royal Air Force (RAF) as an airman during the final years of the Cold War, in this article I critically consider a key element of British military exceptionalism. Rather than pride, these reflections invoke a mix of authorial guilt and shame, the latter of which is rooted in the political role played by an institution whose violence is normalized and its members eulogized. In order to demonstrate this disparity in perception, attention is paid to the relative ease of RAF basic training, tensions between the assumed hardships of active service in a war zone and its reality, and the role of racism and individual agency in the RAF. In so doing, auto-ethnographic material is included to reveal the mundane and unremarkable, yet illustrative experiences of the RAF clerk whose lifeworld as a military actor in a support role differs sharply from how he or she might be imagined by the wider public. Framed by the author’s status as a former Royal Air Force (RAF) service-person and subsequently as a critical sociologist, this article considers the performative role of pride in both exceptionalizing and legitimizing military actors and the RAF, respectively. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |